New Impression of Kurdish and you will Turkish towards Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect from Persian Azerbaijan as well as the Adjoining Regions

New Impression of Kurdish and you will Turkish towards Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect from Persian Azerbaijan as well as the Adjoining Regions

—–. 1989. The brand new Syntax and you will Semantics regarding Verb Morphology in Progressive Aramaic: A beneficial Jewish Dialect from Iraqi Kurdistan. Western Oriental Show, 69. The Sanctuary: Western China Area.

Meehan, Charles, and you may Jacqueline Alon. 1979. The brand new Boy Whoever Tunic Stuck so you can Him: An effective Folktale on Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect out of Zakho (Iraqi Kurdistan). Israel China Degree nine:174-203.

Sabar, Yona. 1976. Lel-Huza: Story and you may Records in the a cycle out of Lamentations toward Ninth of Abdominal about Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect out of Zakho. JSS -62.

—–. 1988. The book out-of Exodus within the Neo-Aramaic on Dialect of your own Jewish People of Zakho [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Magnes Drive.

This type of half dozen binyanim out-of Syriac had been low in NENA to a couple of first classes, with a third directly allied into the second

Thomason, Sarah Gray, and you will Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Code Get in touch with, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and you can Los angeles: Univ. out-of Ca Push.

The original classification descends from the peal, next category from the pael, while the third, whoever vocalism uses that of another, hails from new afel

Various other basis complicating the issue is the differential influences of one’s certain co-territorial dialects. The fresh dialect distinctions inside Kurdish are particularly considerable, also to the impact should be traced a number of the version certainly NENA languages. For example, brand new Jewish Neo-Aramaic of Halabja, for instance the Kurdish of your town, does not identify a gift and you will upcoming stressful, however, where Kurdish maintains such as a significant difference, thus really does Neo-Aramaic. In Azerbaijan, Turkish has exerted solid affect the brand new Jewish dialect (Garbell 1965b), additionally the dialects of your plain off Mosul tell you an effective determine out-of Arabic perhaps not seen elsewhere.

Tkhuma (Tx): What out-of descendants out of emigrants in one of your own semi-independent ashirets from southeast Poultry, now resident along the Khabur Area within the Syria. Data is off Jacobi (1973) and you can my cards.

(5) Syriac had around three first verbal stems, the fresh peal, the new pael, and also the afel. To these was indeed additional about three passive stems, shaped regarding the earliest of them of the prefixation from e[Theta]-: the latest age[Theta]pael, this new e[Theta]paal, as well as the ettafal. This example can be found during the NENA. In most NENA dialects, verbs have a tendency to stay in the verb groups in which they were used in prior to levels of your own words. That’s, the newest descendant away from an excellent Syriac peal verb might possibly be a good NENA Classification We verb, and you will a great Syriac pael verb will be an excellent NENA Category II verb: particularly, Urmi ptaxa ‘open’ away from earlier peal, and you can sadure ‘send’ regarding before https://datingranking.net/de/elite-dating-de/ pael. But not, when you look at the Jewish Azerbaijani, Halabja, and perhaps Koy Sanjaq, the category subscription might have been reorganized which can be foreseeable with the basis of the shape of new stalk unlike its historical supply. Eg, when you look at the Azerbaijani new C stalk contains the setting CaCoC- to own sound verbs, any sort of the resource, and you will CCaC- having center-weak verbs: garosen ‘I in the morning pulling’, but kwasan ‘I (f.) have always been descending’ (Garbell 1965, 64).

(11) Several other most high creativity when you look at the NENA is the 3rd person copula having l: ile ‘he is’, ila ‘she is’. This form will get get (Noldeke 1868, 203) off i[Theta] leh ‘he has’, but no copula like it is outside NENA. The initial and you will next people lack an l, but from inside the Jewish Azerbaijani, in which the l might have been general from the paradigm: Jilu iwIt ‘you (masc.) are’, Aradhin we:profit ‘I (masc.) am’, Azerbai big’ (Garbell 1965, 64). ile is through the NENA but inside the Halabja, which has -(y)e: yarxa rahamim-ye ‘it ‘s the few days of mercy’. Neither Turoyo neither Mandaic enjoys versions synchronous so you can ile: Turoyo harke-yo ‘he try here’, harke-no ‘I have always been here’; Mandaic basim-ye ‘he was charming’, basim-na ‘I are charming’ (Macuch 1965, 443).

(19) The existing Aramaic keyword for ‘son’, bra when you look at the BT, could have been lengthened in all NENA except Hertevin by introduction of the diminutive suffix -ona/-una: Azerbaijan Jewish brona (Garbell 1965, 297), Jilu bruna (Fox 1992, 51), Aradhin bru:na (Krotkoff 1982, 122), Tisqopa brona (Rubba, personal telecommunications), Zakho brona (Meehan and you will Alon 1979, 177). But not, both Turoyo and Mandaic provides an epenthetic vowel, but zero suffix: Turoyo ?abro (Jastrow 1985, 221), and you can Mandaic eber or ebra (Macuch 1965, 520).

b) Oftentimes, Hertevin aligns which have Turoyo, against the remainder of NENA. It lacks an excellent CCaCa expose stressful (6), does not have any sodir preterite (12), does not have any preposition ta (15), and you may uses ruh to make reflexive pronouns (14).

—–. 1965. The fresh new Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect off Persian Azerbaijan: Linguistic Data and you can Folkloristic Messages. Janua Linguarum, collection practica 3. New Hague: Mouton.