All the universities were categorized by Chilean Ministry out of Degree with the three membership, namely lowest-gaining colleges, mid-finding schools and large-finding colleges, reliant this new results of their students in most SIMCE testing ( thirty-two ) .
Standardized procedures were used to measure students’ weight to the nearest 0·1 kg, using a Seca scale (SECA, Hamburg, Germany), and height to the nearest 0·1 cm, using a Holtain stadiometer. All instruments were verified before measuring each participant ( Reference Gibson 33 ) . BMI (kg/m 2 ) and height-for-age were evaluated, and Z-scores were obtained according to the references of the Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics (USA) ( Reference Kuczmarski, Ogden and Guo 34 ) . Nutritional status was defined as follows: underweight, BMI Z-score 1; normal weight, BMI Z-score from ?1 to +1; overweight, BMI Z-score from +1 to +<2; and obesity, BMI Z-score ?+2.
Socio-monetary updates (SES) is counted playing with a measure centered on Graffar’s altered method and therefore is actually adapted in order to Chilean metropolitan and you will outlying populations ( Reference Alvarez, Muzzo and Ivaple to the five socio-economic groups: 1=highest (0·step three %); 2=mid–higher (14·seven %); 3=center (step three8·step 3 %); 4=mid–reduced (45·6 %); and you will 5=lower (step one·1 %). Although not, within analysis we merged such five kinds to the about three: large (1+2), middle (3) and you may reduced (4+5) SES.
Statistical analysis included performing ? 2 tests to compare categorical variables, and ANOVA and Bonferroni tests for comparison of continuous variables. After performing bivariate analyses with each potential confounding variable, including sex, grade, nutritional status, SES and school’s performance, we used logistic regression to assess the relationship between the nutritional quality of snacks at school (exposure) and individual academic performance in Mathematics and Language (outcome). In each case, the probability of passing the test was estimated using three models. In the second model, SES was added. Finally, a fully adjusted model contained all mentioned covariates with the addition of a variable denoting the school’s academic performance. Because the variable school’s performance was partly derived from the outcome variables, this adjustment may cause underestimation of the association, so we included models with and without adjustment for school’s performance. A P value of <0·05 denoted statistical significance. Data were processed using the statistical software package Stata SE for Windows version 12·0.
Our very own take to was made right up away from thirteen·1 ( sd dos·3) year-old men (52 %) and you can people (forty eight %) adolescents away from lowest (44·step three %), middle (39·6 %) and higher (step one6·step 1 %) SES. They attended fifth (51·9 %) and you may 9th (48·step 1 %) degrees in public places (34·8 %), partly paid (57·8 %) and personal schools (7·cuatro %) in the Santiago Urban Region. In terms of health position, 45 % away from professionals had been fat or obese. Almost half of the FKK-Dating-Webseiten young (forty eight %) went to large-gaining schools, whereas 31 % and you will 23 % attended mid- and you will reduced-reaching schools, correspondingly.
Throughout the try, 56 % out-of college students said consumption of facts at the snack time that have been high in weight, glucose, salt and effort. Thirty-six % was regarded to have worst-to-fair snack, while merely 8 % have been considered to consume compliment activities inside treat date at the college or university. Desk step 1 provides the detailed statistics of your own sample. Average opinions off ratings for the Language and you may Mathematics was in fact notably ong people who have all the way down nutritional quality of food in school (P=0·01). The express off college students drinking unhealthy snacks at school is significantly large one of 9th graders (59 %; P=0·040), college students gonna lowest-finding schools (61 %; P=0·036), and one of underweight and you can typical-lbs participants (69 % and you can 62 %, respectively; P=0·006).
About the Author